2022 PAREIDOLIA: SONGS OF (DIS)BELIEF

CURATORIAL NOTE

“The order that our mind imagines, is like a net, or like a ladder, built to attain something. But afterward you must throw the ladder away, because you discover that, even if it was useful, it was meaningless.”
Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose

Somethings are understood by instinct, and others are learned comprehension. While some symbols are instantly recognisable, do they always mean what you think they mean? Just as all cyphers cannot be cracked with a singular code, Jahangir Asgar Jani’s watercolours are not to be deciphered with a single lens. Perhaps this search for meaning lies in the past, in the depths of memory, or in the folds of time? That is, if one believes in meaning at all. ‘Pareidolia: songs of (dis)belief’ asks you, the viewer, to shed preconceived notions as you navigate Jahangir Asgar Jani’s watercolours.
Stepping away (briefly) from making sculptures, the medium of watercolours has allowed Jani to play with light, and create works that seem fluid and ephemeral. The sharp confidence of each line is diffused by the pale translucence of watercolours. However, each image reveals a grid which gives the work a robust structure. Thus framed, but not constrained, calligraphy and architectural form overlap, and around them, birds fly, soaring and diving, unrestrained. Perhaps messengers or symbols of the soul or simply visual devices to draw the eye, the interpretation of birds, depends on the viewer’s own structures of belief/disbelief.
Creating a dream-like atmosphere, the terrain is cloudy and perspectives shift with remarkable ease. Is it an urban landscape, or monumental calligraphy? The representation of a fast changing world, or a fantastical landscape where writing and drawing merge? When do alphabets become words? When do scribbles and markings on the page become writing, and start to make sense? Since the relationship between script and language is one that Jani has closely observed, and he is able to deconstruct words and motifs from religious associations, making charms and amulets that protect as much as they provoke. The Panja (a sacred handprint), for example, is now more than a talismanic device and contains multitudes of stories within it.
For Jani, it is evident that the world is constructed with form and words, both of which are malleable on sheets of paper. His work invokes Italo Calvino’s Invisible Cities, where Marco Polo says: “Cities, like dreams are made of desires and fears, even if the thread of their discourse is secret, their rules are absurd, their perspectives deceitful and everything conceals something else […].” What rules apply to the arches, the tall towers and subterranean landscape in Jani’s work? Just as a master calligrapher privileges aesthetics and symmetry, and relies on the viewer to know where the nukta (diacritic mark) ought to be placed in order to be able to read, Jani trusts the viewer to read his Verses.
By flattening the globe, ironing out the creases of the map of the earth while integrating the form of the globe in Ta’aveel (5), Jani spells out the scope of his engagement: this work is not rooted to a particular geography, or Islamic theology, but exists in a wide spectrum. There is no tension between word and image in Jani’s world but a coexistence, and an open-mindedness towards interpretation. His voice is a faint but firm whisper, heard through indications, subtle nudges and suggestions but without insisting upon a singular point of view, or asserting a fixed meaning. In creating space of dialogue, a place for belief and room for disbelief, the artworks in Jani’s Pareidolia manifest unique patterns, which range from protest to despair, from hope to celebration, poetry to prayer. Fragmented but not broken, the spiritual and the mundane sit comfortably together, as do natural forms and man-made constructions. The artworks create a world where poetry is insinuated rather than recited, understood rather than expounded. Comprehension hangs on a thread of belief, of devotion, and in the same way, on skepticism.
Jani is on a search for meaning, and attempts to trace the roots of implicitly knowing, and acquired knowledge. The artist has left a series of clues for the viewer, some disjointed, others distracting, and he lets you find your own language to decipher messages. The line from Antoine De Saint-Exupéry’s classic The Little Prince resonates perfectly: L’essentiel est invisible aux yeux (What is essential is invisible to the eyes.) In Pareidolia: songs of (dis)belief you have to choose what you see, but with more than just your eyes.

APARNA ANDHARE

Is an art critic and curator.

2008 CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR METAMORPHOSES

METAMORPHOSES

By astutely recreating a museum ethos for his figural sculptures, Jani mocks the whole business of museum display: the high-cultural commodity with its classicism, conservatism and monoculturalism. The clues of alternative modes of being are inserted into this: alternative sexuality, alternative perception of the male body, readings of fertility and virility myths, and androgyny in place of macho heroism.

… On the level of seductive but disturbing beauty and gut sensation, Jani evokes complex layers of our relationship with animals- its hoary source, the merely suppressed “beastliness” of instinctual drives that always resurface and the metaphorically felt kinship with natural grace, liveliness and robustness. Jani recalls archaic yearly rituals that give release to pent-up feral stirrings – from the Ides of March to Holi, and less unruly contemporary carnivals of partying, perhaps rioting too. If hybrid imagination is steeped in ancient and classic eras, our loosely familiar, global world today offers its own embodiments, when artistic, ideological and fantasy paradigms from many countries, times and cultures meet and screen one another in a sudden commonality of once alien heritage elements. Day to day proximity to animals has its specific influence, whereas experiments in genetic engineering have started to baffle our understanding of categories, identity and uniqueness, not to mention their ethical consequences and existential anxiety. Besides, the local situation is replete with diverse realities living side-by-side – urban and rural landscapes, male and female sensibilities, displacements against a kaleidoscope of social, religious, linguistic and economic strata. Sometimes ignorant of or indifferent to one another, more often-such realities need to mediate a tentative, clashing and partial symbiosis. Thus, we are always and always have been creatures of a hybrid condition…

MARTA JAKIMOWICZ

Is an art critic and curator.

2007 CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS

WHAT A MAN CAN EXPECT

In ‘Great Expectations,’ Jani brings a subversive spirit not just to classical themes and images he quotes, but also to his own oeuvre. Clad in virulent blues and greens, embedded with flashing LED’s, sitting on stainless steel trays, the sculptures in this show seem the result of a collision between Jani’s earlier figures and the aesthetic of the small-town-mela.

The question that followed me through my viewing of the work was why the kitsch was there; what it brought to the work? But, as Jani pointed out to me, the kitsch was not a new arrival in his work. Even the full-scale figures with their articulated musculature and gold-leaf skins derived as much from ‘kitsch’ as from ‘art’ – for the fibre glass imitation of classical sculpture can be found in so many nouveau riche drawing rooms today. If his earlier ‘classicizing’ figures have also been made in the spirit of pastiche, this show, then, layers low kitsch onto high kitsch, challenging and mocking the viewer’s settled ideas of ‘art’ and ‘good taste’. This is, possibly, the most politically potent gesture that Jani makes through this show.

KAVITA SINGH

Is an art historian and is associate professor at the School of Art and Aesthetics at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

2007 CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR REDEFINITIONS

JANI, BOMBAY AND THE BODY WITHOUT ORGANS

The background, in contradistinction, is spectacularly colourful. With its bands of looping, dripping, blurring, and at times scripted paint, it suggests the increasingly globalized forms of graffiti art that have come to define hip-hop style. But while much contemporary documentary photography of graffiti steps back to register the artist’s violation of civic or private property, to show how the graffiti forms occupy spaces not officially intended for them, in Jani’s paintings we are pulled right up close to the graffiti forms. We are brought intimately into the scene of this occupation. In some paintings we are pulled so tightly up into the graffiti that the relation of these coloured forms to their surroundings disappears: we appear to be lost in an abstract expressionist tableau. In others, Jani distances us from these forms: we are aware of the action and violation intended. As we move from painting to painting, we recognize how practices of intimacy and distance constitute our sense of order, how the affective landscapes against which these mysterious body-forms are set cannot, despite their vividness, be taken for granted.

Nor is the hierarchy of relation between figure and field obvious. In a few paintings, the painted graffiti colours drip onto the figure of the body itself, as if they are either invading or enriching the quiet of the unknown body. In several others, the body outline appears cellotaped onto the background. Body and background are intimately joined through the intensity of our being brought up close to the wall, as it were, of urban life. But how they are joined, which as it were is prior to the other, remains in question here…

LAWRENCE COHEN

is an associate professor in the Department of Anthropology and the Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, USA.

2005 ESSAY FOR ALTERNATE LYRICISM

SCULPTED WATERMARKS. AN ALTERNATE LYRICISM

Jehangir Jani ‘s primary concern is with the beauty and aesthetic of medium, and with form – in this case, the spare, monochromatic male figure; its pristine nude beauty is seen juxtaposed against equally spare animal forms rendered with delicate precision and brought to life in imploding bursts of water and restrained colour.

The artist uses these minute painterly expositions to articulate his assertions – a set of searing truths arrived at through a re-visitation of “myths, alleged historical events and dogmas. Particularly those used to perpetrate acts of othering.” It is this `othering,’ the “making invisible or silent,”1 which surfaces once more in his discourse, investing his water-olours with silent, understated, but intentionally provocative, even perverse, edginess.

ANUP MEHTA

is a writer, freelance editor, curator, columnist and arts manager. Founder editor, Art India, she was contributing editor, Asian Art News and World Sculpture News, Hong Kong. She lives and works out of Ahmedabad and Mumbai

2005 ESSAY FOR ALTERNATE LYRICISM

CRITICAL INTERFACES IN JAHANGIR JANI’S ARTISTIC EXPLORATIONS

JJ indeed is an artist and an activist. He engages with multi-layered discourses around phenomenological experiences on the one hand and on the other with the systemic socio-political structure(s) that under grid and discriminate the lives of sexual and communitarian minorities. Despite the fact that today the concerns of art and activism may seem relatively unproblematic within the operative field of “high” art, these issues however can not be serialized or prioritized as to which comes first (or, which is more important). This is still a problematic, and the issues however can neither be reduced to an unproblematic conflation of art and activism nor can these categories be discussed in terms of irreconcilability. The questions that emerge from his art certainly relate to lived interfaces between art and activism, of living life within institutional and non-institutional structures and outside a subculture(s), doing art within available systems and the broad differences that divide them as well as the connections that exist in between.

SHIVAJI PANIKKAR

is an art historian and has published several books on contemporary art in India. He was Dean of the Fine Art Faculty M. S. U. Baroda. He is presently Dean of D. Babasaheb Ambedkar University, New Delhi

2005 CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR PEERS

THE MAKING OF PEERS

The self-taught artist, fiercely independent of cliques or trends, has been a whirlwind of activity since his first canvases were exhibited in 1991. To place in order the primary media employed in his shows since 2000 reads impressively as: watercolour, sculpture, mixed media, oil on canvas, metal, cement, latex, carpets, mixed media, metal, oil on canvas, steel and fibre-glass.

Here we see a strong distinction between pain and suffering. Clearly Jehangir sees pain as a vehicle through which one can have a much stronger, intense vision of the beauty of existence; in contrast suffering inhibits this and it is at this point that Jahangir’s world- view veers away from traditional Christian doctrine. Ultimately, the most important insight that Jehangir brings to his work is the idea that “Paradise is here”.

MORTIMER CHATTERJEE

is partner with Gallery Chatterjee And Lal

2004 CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR PATIENCE OF JOB.

CASTING AN ‘INFIDEL’ HEAD

In Jani’s personal interpretation, Job becomes an individual searching for universal love, one of the chief values cherished by the Sufis. He imparts a pop-kitsch edge to Job’s resilience: his Job is not represented as a solemn, larger-than-life victim, but as an ordinary human being who goes through the spectacle of everyday savagery with a discreet smile on his face. The major subtext of Jani’s relief sculptures, with each of their backgrounds variously characterising the natural elements and the diurnal cycle of life, is the tension between lack and excess, push and pull, suffering and pleasure.

NANCY ADAJANIA

is a cultural theorist and curator. She writes for various international publications. She was also editor of Art India magazine

2004, CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR PORTRAITS.

THE OTHERNESS OF THE SELF

During the last decade, Jehangir Jani has extended his artistic practice in a variety of directions: he has experimented with sculpture and assemblage, investigating the expressive possibilities of ceramic, sheet metal and steel; he has committed himself to installation and inter-media works, as well as to collaborative performances; he has developed figurative suites in watercolour. Through these forms, in each of which he has played between declarative candour and oblique allusion, Jani has involved his viewers in an unfolding drama of the narrative self: a self that performs its predicaments, conflicts and irresolutions through a sequence of symbolic gestures, asides, half-veiled self-portraits. In the process, Jani has demonstrated himself to be a protean artist, dedicated to the exploration of expressive strategies rather than motivated by any desire to master a single image-making method or a constraining fixity of style. Diverse as they may appear, however, Jani’s formal departures are elaborated around a central concern: the male figure cast, not as the defiant hero who overcomes the conspiracies of circumstance, but as the survivor who endures the wounds of choice as well as the stigmata imposed on him by society. If Jani’s works have been veined by a certain romanticism, it is one that marks the isolation of the reluctant martyr, not the flamboyance of the decadent.

2004 ON PORTRAITS

“.Even as he steps beyond the potential sectarianism of a sexual minority, the artist braces it in the mode of inquiry. This duality of attitude is symptomatic of the liminal space, the space of betweenness, that Jani’s figures occupy: while proposing a portraiture of the self, they also point to the permanent Otherness implicit in that self. Rendered in the current moment, coded with its anxieties, they yet encrypt ancestral psychological realities, recall the deep cave of primitive consciousness.”

RANJIT HOSKOTE

is a cultural theorist, independent curator and poet. He has published several books on art, artists, and four collections of poetry.

2002 ON LAZARUS AND ANARKALI

RELIGIOUS SCORES, NEW-AGE TECHNO CULTURES AND MUSEAL TALES

The same museal understanding of the devices of the new art is present in Jehangir Jani’s sculptures: treating the space of the gallery as a space where the museum is both created and deconstructed, subverting the norms of permanence, security and authority of meaning.

[Extract from: Nancy Adajania, ‘Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen folkloristischen Imagination/ Towards A New Folkloric Imagination’, in Gerald Matt, Angelika Fitz and Michael Woergoetter, eds., Kapital und Karma: Aktuelle Positionen indischer Kunst/ Capital and Karma: Recent Positions in Indian Art (Kunsthalle Wien/ Hatje Cantz Verlag: Vienna/ Ostfildern-Ruit, 2002)

NANCY ADAJANIA

is a cultural theorist and curator. She writes for various international publications. She was also editor of Art India magazine

2002 CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR LAZARUS AND ANARKALI

THE DANCER IN THE TOMB

Jehangir Jani’s recent installation, “Lazarus and Anarkali”, strikes its viewers with decisive emphasis. It is among the very few works in its genre, produced in India, that are both shockingly subversive and deeply moving.

“Lazarus and Anarkali” is a constellation of sculptures made using latex, resin, fabric, sequins, metal, translites, and neon and argon lights; it also incorporates incense and an audio track, addressing not only the eye but the entire range of human senses. Unlike many Indian installation projects, which play at radical politics while hiding behind comfortable generalities, this artwork exposes the artist to a genuine measure of risk.

Not only does it oblige us to face the discomfiting reality of death and the uncertainty of resurrection, but it also throws our pieties into confusion by interweaving death with beauty, the elegiac with the sensuous.

RANJIT HOSKOTE

Is a cultural theorist, independent curator and poet. He has published several books on art, artists, and four collections of poetry.

SUMMER 2001 CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR THE BODIED SELF

Jani’s approach to the bodied self stems from a concern with oblique self portraiture, a bearing of witness to the conflict between the rational nature that is presented in public and the instinctive one that is nurtured in secret. Jani’s imagery may be classified off Kalighat.. The artist has skillfully adapted the style associated with the marketplace painters and printmakers of 19th century Kolkatta. In recovering an older genre of subaltern cultural production for contemporary high culture, it may seem that Jani has acted as an arcvhivist: and yet he re kindles these recovered forms, abrades them with the friction of an alternate sexuality.. his self portraying intervention is impelled by laughter: survival as the translation of desire and pain into a triumphant, comedic act of self assertion.”

RANJIT HOSKOTE

Is a cultural theorist, independent curator and poet. He has published several books on art, artists, and four collections of poetry.

2000 ON STORIES

” Not just the notes but the spaces between them that are important, Jani beckons the viewer to look at the absent, the imaginary images…sculptures are like those in a museum or a cave which leave the viewer in wonder( because of the grandeur and craftsmanship usually) and at the same time unresponsive.”

Jasmine Shah Varma

is a curator and art critic

1998 catalogue essay for Faerie Tales, A Re-look

MARKED BY RESTRAINT

Jehangir Jani’s protagonists inhabit a Foucaldian world, where desire and power face off without any apparent mediatory possibilities. And some of the titles of his work in `Faerie Tales…A Re-look’ (`Chaka Chakka Chakka Chakka Chakka Chakka’; `Naked Flowers/Pansies’) themselves hint at an immediate response on the part of the artist to the slings and arrows of convention. But Jani’s creative effort, a parallel to Foucault’s authorial voice, is altogether more considered than those in your face titles or the first shock of facing his outrageously phallic constructions might lead us to believe.

Jani’s characters- trapped, manacled, racked- are restrained from journeying to the untravelled world which gleams through the arch of experience, but we spectators can move beyond our initial shock to the more subtle details apparent in the artist’s work. The stoic countenances that Jani has crafted, some of them modeled on the artist’s own face, counter any attempts to place his work in a kinetic- rebellious category. While these shackled characters cannot transcend their situation, they seem to posses, like Sisyphus in Camus’ vision, an awareness, a consciousness of their state.

Satre considered Camus’ view too dark to be genuinely existentialist, and the consciousness Jani’s figures possess seems also to be small compensation for the tortures to which they are subjected, the restraints which have marked, scarred, mutilated them, the immobility which is a sign of their helplessness. The clay body, of desire, is overmatched by the metal of a soul, of society…

GIRISH SHAHANE

Is an art historian curator. He was editor of Art India magazine. He writes for various magazines and publications.